Diagnostic Radiology Residency for IMGs: Evidence-Based Competitive Analysis

Diagnostic Radiology Residency for IMGs: Evidence-Based Competitive Analysis and Strategic Guidance

Current NRMP data, program director priorities, and contemporary peer-reviewed research on how IMG applicants can optimize their competitive positioning in one of the most algorithmically selective specialties in graduate medical education.

Diagnostic Radiology Competitiveness: Comparative Context

Aggregate IMG Match Rates (2026 NRMP Data)

To contextualize the diagnostic radiology IMG match, comparison to aggregate IMG match statistics across all specialties provides essential baseline data. The 2026 NRMP Main Residency Match, PGY-1 level, shows:

All active applicants: 38,354 matched of 48,050 (79.8 percent). These aggregate statistics establish the baseline against which diagnostic radiology IMG match outcomes should be evaluated. The 23.5-point disparity between U.S. MD match rates (93.5 percent) and U.S. IMG match rates (70.0 percent) illustrates the substantial competitive disadvantage that international medical graduates face across graduate medical education.

Diagnostic Radiology Position Growth and Application Trends

Recent analysis by Futela et al. (2025) examining trends from 2020-2025 documents substantial shifts in the diagnostic radiology training landscape. Diagnostic radiology positions offered increased 11.3 percent (2020-2025). U.S. MD applicants to diagnostic radiology increased from 56.3 percent to 59.2 percent of total ERAS applicants over the same period. The proportion of applicants from U.S. medical schools has grown steadily.

The growth in positions, while substantial, has been outpaced by the rising proportion of highly competitive domestic applicants (U.S. MD seniors), intensifying competitive pressure on IMG applicants.

Training Pathway Architecture in Diagnostic Radiology

PGY-2 Advanced Position as Standard Training Route

A critical distinction for IMG applicants concerns the dominant training pathway in diagnostic radiology. The PGY-2 advanced position — requiring completion of a preliminary year (typically internal medicine or transitional year) before entry into specialty-specific radiology training — represents the standard and primary training structure in diagnostic radiology, comprising approximately 87 percent of all diagnostic radiology positions offered annually.

The PGY-2 pathway is not a “fallback” or secondary option — it is the predominant training structure through which the majority of radiologists in the United States, including those from highly competitive medical schools, enter the specialty.

PGY-1 Direct-Entry Integrated Pathway

Positions available: limited (approximately 150-200 positions annually). Represents newer integrated training model. More selective for PGY-1 entry; fewer applicants can pursue this direct route. Requires demonstrated exceptional competitiveness or unique qualifications.

Implications for IMG Pathway Selection

For IMG applicants, the PGY-2 advanced pathway provides the most substantial opportunity for diagnostic radiology training. While competitive, this pathway offers the majority of available positions and access to training across competitiveness spectrum. IMG applicants should approach training pathway selection strategically, recognizing the preliminary year as an essential developmental experience that strengthens radiologic knowledge before formal specialty training begins.

Program Director Priorities in Selection: NRMP 2024 Program Director Survey Data

Understanding how diagnostic radiology program directors prioritize applicant evaluation is essential for IMG strategic planning. The 2024 NRMP Program Director Survey provides authoritative data on factors program directors consider when selecting applicants for interview and for ranking.

Notable Lower-Priority Factors

Away Rotation at Another Institution: 20 percent of programs consider (importance 3.2/5). Visa Status: 20 percent of programs consider (importance 3.8/5). Ability to Work Legally in U.S. Without Visa: 30 percent of programs consider (importance 4.0/5).

Structural Factors Influencing Diagnostic Radiology IMG Competitiveness

Factor 1: USMLE Step 2 CK Performance as Critical Selection Gatekeeper

With the transition to USMLE Step 1 pass/fail grading (implemented 2022), USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) has emerged as the primary numerical screening metric for diagnostic radiology program directors.

According to the 2024 NRMP Program Director Survey, diagnostic radiology programs weight Step 2 CK performance heavily. 87 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider Step 2 CK scores in interview selection. The importance rating of 4.7/5 represents the highest possible importance tier and matches the importance rating for USMLE Step 1 pass while exceeding most other metrics.

Published data on diagnostic radiology program expectations indicates that 90 percent of diagnostic radiology program directors review Step 2 CK scores before application consideration. An informal but widely-referenced Step 2 CK score threshold of 250+ has emerged as competitive baseline for diagnostic radiology. Scores below 250 substantially reduce interview invitation probability. Scores above 260 provide meaningful competitive advantage.

Factor 2: Preference Signaling as Interview Enhancement Strategy

The introduction of preference signaling in the 2023-2024 application cycle represents a meaningful intervention in diagnostic radiology selection. According to the NRMP Program Director Survey, preference signals substantially influence interview selection: 90 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider preference signals in interview selection, with an importance rating of 4.4/5 (high importance).

Ching et al. conducted empirical analysis of preference signal impact on diagnostic radiology interview rates in the 2024 match cycle:

The nine-fold differential in interview probability between gold-signaled and non-signaled programs represents a substantial intervention point. For an applicant applying to a portfolio of 60-70 programs with strategic signal allocation, the expected interview yield differential approximates 5-6 additional interviews per application cycle.

Strategic Implication: Preference signals should be viewed as an interview-generation tool, not as a determinant of match probability. The goal of signaling is to secure interview invitations; matching outcomes depend on interview performance.

Factor 3: Interview Performance as Determinant of Match Probability

Once applicants secure interviews, interview performance becomes paramount. According to NRMP survey data, the ranking-critical factors are interpersonal skills (87 percent of programs, 4.9/5 importance — the highest rated factor), faculty interactions during interview (87 percent of programs, 4.9/5 importance — the highest rated factor), resident feedback on applicant (77 percent of programs, 4.3/5 importance), and house staff interactions (80 percent of programs, 4.5/5 importance).

These data show that program directors prioritize clinical/interpersonal assessment during the interview substantially more heavily than pre-interview credentials for final ranking decisions.

Implication for IMG Applicants: IMG applicants should recognize that while initial interview procurement requires strong credentials (Step 2 CK, class ranking, preference signals), conversion to ranking offers relatively level playing field. If an IMG applicant successfully secures an interview, clinical performance and interpersonal competence during that interview substantially determine ranking probability.

Factor 4: Away Rotations — Clarifying the Evidence

The role of away rotations in diagnostic radiology competitiveness requires careful interpretation. According to the 2024 NRMP Program Director Survey, 20 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider “away rotation in your specialty at another institution” with an importance rating of 3.2/5 (relatively low). For ranking decisions, 13 percent of programs consider this factor with importance 3.3/5. This NRMP data suggests away rotations carry substantially lower priority than other factors in program director decision-making.

Practical Implication for IMG Applicants: While away rotations at target programs may be impactful (based on Phillipi findings), they are not prerequisite for interview consideration or ranking. IMG applicants without access to diagnostic radiology away rotations should not view this as disqualifying. Instead, focus should remain on controllable metrics: Step 2 CK performance, preference signal allocation, and interview preparation.

Factor 5: Program Director Assessment of IMG-Specific Factors

The NRMP survey data reveals program director priorities regarding visa sponsorship and international training credentials. For interview selection, visa status is considered by 20 percent of programs with importance 3.8/5; ability to work legally in U.S. without visa is considered by 30 percent of programs with importance 4.0/5. For ranking decisions, visa status is considered by 17 percent of programs with importance 4.0/5; ability to work legally without visa is considered by 17 percent of programs with importance 4.1/5.

Interpretation. The relatively low reported consideration of visa status (20 percent for interview, 17 percent for ranking) is noteworthy, particularly given that non-U.S. IMGs must obtain visa sponsorship. Possible explanations include:

• Self-selection by applicants. Non-U.S. IMGs may strategically target programs with known visa sponsorship capacity, resulting in fewer applications to visa-unwilling programs.
• Post-interview evaluation. Program directors may determine visa sponsorship capacity post-interview rather than using it as initial screening criterion.
• Institutional context. Visa sponsorship infrastructure and willingness varies substantially by institution, and program directors at visa-willing institutions may not report it as a “factor” because it is assumed or routine.

Strategic Implication for Non-U.S. IMGs: While visa status shows lower explicit priority in NRMP survey data, non-U.S. IMGs should systematically research program-level visa sponsorship capacity before investing application efforts. The low reported consideration may reflect institutional variation rather than across-the-board unwillingness.

IMG Competitive Positioning: U.S. IMGs vs. Non-U.S. IMGs

Distinct Competitive Landscapes

A nuanced but critical distinction exists between U.S. IMGs (individuals who graduated from international medical schools but hold U.S. citizenship or permanent residency) and non-U.S. IMGs (non-U.S. citizens without permanent residency, requiring visa sponsorship). These groups experience materially different selection environments.

U.S. IMGs in Diagnostic Radiology

Competitive Characteristics. Benefit from U.S. citizenship or permanent residency status (no visa sponsorship required). Face credential evaluation burden (international medical degree credential assessment). May have limited U.S. clinical exposure depending on medical school location and timing of U.S. training entry. Aggregate IMG match rate (all specialties): 70.0 percent.

Competitive Assessment. U.S. IMGs face credential-perception barriers relative to U.S. MD/DO graduates but benefit from visa status certainty. For diagnostic radiology, competitive positioning depends primarily on controllable factors: USMLE scores (especially Step 2 CK), clinical experience breadth, research productivity, and interview performance.

Non-U.S. IMGs in Diagnostic Radiology

Competitive Characteristics. Must obtain visa sponsorship (VisaScreen certification, J-1 visa coordination). Face additional administrative and credentialing requirements. Aggregate IMG match rate (all specialties): 56.4 percent. Program-level visa sponsorship capacity varies substantially.

Visa Sponsorship Assessment. Despite relatively low reported consideration of visa status in NRMP survey (20 percent for interview, 17 percent for ranking), non-U.S. IMGs pursuing diagnostic radiology must explicitly assess program-level visa sponsorship capacity. Strategic program research should include:

• Documentation of prior non-U.S. IMG matches in target program
• Direct inquiry regarding visa sponsorship: Is the program actively sponsoring visas? Does the program have experience with J-1 visa coordination?
• Institutional infrastructure assessment: Does the institution employ an international scholar services office?
• Faculty familiarity assessment: Do program directors have experience with visa-requiring international medical graduates?

Non-U.S. IMGs should prioritize programs demonstrating established visa sponsorship infrastructure over programs without documented international IMG experience.

Workforce Trends and Career Sustainability

Radiologist Workforce Dynamics

While immediate match probability presents a formidable challenge for IMG applicants, understanding longer-term workforce trends provides important context for career planning. Malhotra et al. (2026), analyzing radiology workforce data from 2007-2025, documented several key trends.

Residency Position Growth. Diagnostic radiology residency positions grew 33 percent (2010-2025).

Practicing Radiologist Supply Growth. Total practicing radiologists grew 12 percent (2010-2022). Radiologists per 100,000 population showed marginal growth (11.1 to 11.5 per 100,000).

Analytical Context. The disparity between position growth (33 percent) and practicing radiologist growth (12 percent) indicates that training positions are expanding, yet practicing radiologist supply is constrained. This paradoxical situation suggests that more training positions are being created than there are physicians entering active radiology practice, possibly reflecting workforce transitions, geographic concentration, or career timing factors.

Career Sustainability for IMG Radiologists

This workforce dynamic carries important implications for IMG applicants. The projected physician shortage of 86,000 physicians by 2036 (with diagnostic radiology among anticipated shortage specialties) suggests sustained long-term demand for radiologist services. For IMG applicants who successfully match to diagnostic radiology residency, career sustainability and employment demand trajectory appear favorable.

The gap between training positions created and practicing radiologists entering the workforce suggests that successful match to a diagnostic radiology residency may translate to relatively secure long-term employment and career opportunities. This represents important consideration when weighing career selection trade-offs against demanding match probability.

Methodological Considerations and Limitations

This analysis synthesizes data from multiple sources (NRMP publications, program director survey data, peer-reviewed literature) with varying publication timelines and data granularity. Readers should note the following limitations.

Data Availability. NRMP public reports do not stratify match probability by applicant type within individual specialties. Specialty-specific IMG match rate calculations are not directly published by NRMP. NRMP Program Director Survey represents aggregate program director responses and masks individual program variation.

Program Director Survey Limitations. Survey data represents what program directors report they consider, not necessarily what deterministically influences individual decisions. Reported importance ratings may not perfectly predict actual decision-making weights. Program heterogeneity in selection practices is substantial; aggregate data may not reflect individual program priorities.

Preference Signal and Away Rotation Data. Published signal efficacy data (Ching et al., 2025) represents aggregate patterns; program-level heterogeneity exists. Away rotation data requires clarification: NRMP data on “away rotation at another institution” may differ from away rotations at target program (measured by Phillipi et al.). IMG-specific signal responsiveness may differ from domestic applicants.

Visa Status Reporting. Low reported consideration of visa status (20 percent) may reflect self-selection by applicants rather than true program indifference to visa sponsorship. Non-U.S. IMGs’ successful matching suggests visa sponsorship does occur despite lower explicit priority reporting.

Evidence-Based Strategic Recommendations for IMG Applicants

For international medical graduates contemplating diagnostic radiology pursuit, the following evidence-based recommendations emerge from this analysis.

1. Realistic Competitive Assessment

Recommendation. Conduct rigorous self-assessment of competitive positioning before committing substantial resources to diagnostic radiology pursuit.

Diagnostic radiology represents one of the most competitive specialties in graduate medical education. IMG match outcomes substantially trail domestic applicant match rates (70 percent for U.S. IMGs vs. 93.5 percent for U.S. MDs). Before investing in application preparation, away rotations, or other training pathway optimization, IMG applicants should honestly evaluate USMLE/ECFMG examination performance (Step 2 CK particularly critical given 87 percent program consideration and 4.7/5 importance rating), U.S. clinical experience breadth and depth, research productivity and scholarly publications, letters of recommendation strength from U.S. faculty supervisors, and competitiveness relative to peer IMG applicants.

This honest assessment may indicate that diagnostic radiology pursuit, while possible, requires exceptional effort and carries material risk of unmatched outcome.

2. Strategic Emphasis on USMLE Step 2 CK Performance

Recommendation. Prioritize Step 2 CK preparation and achievement of competitive score (250+).

Step 2 CK performance is the most directly controllable competitive factor for IMG applicants. NRMP survey data shows 87 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider Step 2 CK with highest importance rating (4.7/5). This metric directly influences interview invitation probability. IMG applicants should allocate substantial study time to comprehensive Step 2 CK preparation, target score of 250+ to enhance interview invitation probability, consider additional preparation time relative to Step 1 preparation if Step 2 performance falls below competitive threshold, and recognize that Step 2 CK performance directly influences downstream selection probability.

This represents one of the most controllable competitive factors for IMG applicants.

3. Strategic Preference Signal Allocation

Recommendation. Deploy preference signals strategically based on realistic competitive assessment and program-specific intelligence.

NRMP survey data shows 90 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider preference signals with high importance (4.4/5) for interview selection. However, signals exert less influence on ranking (only 33 percent of programs consider signals in ranking decisions). Strategic signal allocation should recognize signals as interview-generation tools, not matching determinants; research program-level historical IMG matching patterns; assess institutional visa sponsorship infrastructure (for non-U.S. IMGs); identify programs demonstrating documented commitment to international medical graduate training; and allocate signals strategically across a range of program selectivity levels.

Preference signals should be informed by program-specific research, not allocated randomly.

4. Interview Preparation as Critical Success Factor

Recommendation. Prioritize interview preparation with recognition that interview performance is the primary determinant of ranking outcomes.

NRMP survey data shows that interpersonal skills and faculty interactions — both assessed during the interview — are the most important factors for ranking (each rated 4.9/5 importance by 87 percent of programs). This means getting the interview depends on credentials (Step 2 CK, class ranking, preference signals), while matching depends on clinical performance and interpersonal competence demonstrated during the interview.

IMG applicants should invest substantial preparation effort in clinical knowledge reinforcement for diagnostic radiology, practice with interview format and common questions, development of clear communication of clinical reasoning and enthusiasm for specialty, and understanding of program-specific culture and needs.

The interview represents a critical opportunity where IMG applicants can substantially influence match probability through direct clinical and interpersonal demonstration.

5. PGY-2 Pathway as Primary Strategy

Recommendation. Approach PGY-2 advanced training pathway as primary training route rather than secondary option.

The PGY-2 pathway comprises approximately 87 percent of diagnostic radiology positions and represents the standard training structure. IMG applicants should recognize PGY-2 as the predominant and standard diagnostic radiology training pathway, view preliminary year training as essential developmental experience strengthening radiologic knowledge, evaluate PGY-2 pathway selection across program competitiveness spectrum, and consider preliminary year choice (internal medicine vs. transitional year) strategically based on educational and career goals.

The PGY-2 pathway provides the largest pool of positions and should be the focus of IMG application strategy.

6. Non-U.S. IMG-Specific: Visa Sponsorship Assessment

Recommendation (for Non-U.S. IMGs). Conduct explicit program-level assessment of visa sponsorship capacity and institutional commitment.

Despite lower reported consideration of visa status in NRMP survey data, non-U.S. IMGs should systematically evaluate whether the program has documented history of sponsoring international IMG visas, whether the institution employs an international scholar services office, whether institutional and program infrastructure is in place for J-1 visa coordination, and whether the program director has expressed comfort with visa sponsorship.

Non-U.S. IMGs should weight visa sponsorship infrastructure heavily in program selection, as this directly determines whether successful matching translates to ability to pursue training.

7. Alternative Specialty Consideration

Recommendation. Evaluate alternative specialties if diagnostic radiology competitiveness appears prohibitive relative to personal competitive positioning.

IMG applicants with moderate competitiveness should carefully consider alternative specialties offering strong career prospects and intellectual engagement. Pursuing a diagnostic radiology match with low probability of success carries material risk of SOAP participation, unmatched outcome, or acceptance of suboptimal program placement. Alternative specialty selection may better align with realistic competitive positioning while maintaining career satisfaction.

Conclusion

Diagnostic radiology residency matching for international medical graduates presents a substantially more competitive training environment than aggregate IMG match statistics suggest. The combination of position scarcity, high applicant interest, and stringent selection criteria creates a selective training environment requiring exceptional preparation and realistic self-assessment.

However, the NRMP Program Director Survey and recent evidence-based research highlight specific, actionable strategies that IMG applicants can employ to enhance match probability:

• Step 2 CK excellence (87 percent of programs, 4.7/5 importance) represents the most controllable competitive factor with direct influence on interview invitation probability.
• Preference signaling (90 percent of programs, 4.4/5 importance for interviews) substantially enhances interview probability when deployed strategically, though signals exert less influence on final ranking.
• Interview performance (interpersonal skills and faculty interactions rated 4.9/5 importance by 87 percent of programs) represents the primary determinant of ranking and matching outcomes.
• PGY-2 pathway provides the dominant training structure, with substantially more positions available than PGY-1 direct entry.
• Program-specific research regarding IMG-friendliness, visa sponsorship, and historical matching patterns directly informs strategic decision-making.

For IMG applicants committed to diagnostic radiology pursuit, strategic application of these evidence-based recommendations — coupled with honest competitive self-assessment and realistic expectations — enhances match probability while maintaining career planning integrity.

Prospective IMG applicants should approach diagnostic radiology selection with clear-eyed acknowledgment of competitive challenges, coupled with strategic deployment of controllable factors (Step 2 CK performance, preference signal allocation, interview preparation) that research demonstrates meaningfully enhance match outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Step 2 CK score do IMGs need for Diagnostic Radiology?

A competitive Step 2 CK score of 250+ has emerged as the baseline for diagnostic radiology, with scores above 260 providing meaningful competitive advantage. NRMP Program Director Survey data shows 87 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider Step 2 CK with 4.7/5 importance — the highest tier. Approximately 90 percent of program directors review Step 2 CK before further consideration. Scores below 250 substantially reduce interview invitation probability.

How does preference signaling work in Diagnostic Radiology?

Ching et al. (2025) documented striking signal effects: 54 percent interview rate at gold-signaled programs, 40 percent at silver-signaled programs, and 6 percent at non-signaled programs. The nine-fold differential between gold-signaled and non-signaled programs makes signal allocation one of the most actionable interventions in the cycle. However, only 33 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider signals when ranking, so signals should be viewed as interview-generation tools rather than match determinants.

Should IMGs target PGY-1 or PGY-2 positions in Diagnostic Radiology?

The PGY-2 advanced pathway represents approximately 87 percent of all diagnostic radiology positions offered annually (approximately 1,000+ positions) and is the standard training structure for the specialty. The PGY-1 direct-entry integrated pathway offers only 150-200 positions annually and is substantially more selective. The PGY-2 pathway is not a fallback — it is the predominant training architecture through which most U.S. radiologists, including those from highly competitive medical schools, enter the specialty. IMG application strategy should focus there.

Do IMGs need away rotations to match into Diagnostic Radiology?

Away rotations are not prerequisite. The NRMP Program Director Survey reports only 20 percent of diagnostic radiology programs consider “away rotation at another institution” with low importance (3.2/5). Phillipi et al. (2025) reported a higher odds ratio (30.36), but their measurement likely captured rotations at the target program — categorically different from generic aways elsewhere. IMG applicants without access to diagnostic radiology away rotations should focus on controllable metrics: Step 2 CK performance, preference signal allocation, and interview preparation.

How important is the interview for Diagnostic Radiology match outcomes?

Critically important. Interpersonal skills and faculty interactions — both assessed during the interview — are rated at 4.9/5 importance by 87 percent of diagnostic radiology programs as factors in ranking decisions. While getting the interview depends on credentials (Step 2 CK, class ranking, signals), matching depends on clinical performance and interpersonal competence during the interview. For IMG applicants, the interview is where credential disadvantages can be neutralized — and where credential advantages can be squandered.

How does visa status affect Diagnostic Radiology matching for Non-U.S. IMGs?

NRMP survey data reports visa status as considered by only 20 percent of programs for interview selection (importance 3.8/5) and 17 percent for ranking. The low reported priority is likely a function of applicant self-selection — non-U.S. IMGs increasingly research sponsorship capacity before applying, so visa-unwilling programs never enter their portfolio. Non-U.S. IMGs should systematically research program-level visa sponsorship capacity including documented prior non-U.S. IMG matches, J-1 coordination experience, and institutional international scholar services infrastructure before allocating applications or signals.

What is the long-term career outlook for IMGs who match into Diagnostic Radiology?

Workforce data is favorable. Malhotra et al. (2026) documented that diagnostic radiology residency positions grew 33 percent (2010-2025) while practicing radiologist supply grew only 12 percent over a similar window. The AAMC projects a physician shortage of approximately 86,000 by 2036, with diagnostic radiology among the anticipated shortage specialties. For IMG applicants who successfully match, career sustainability and employment demand trajectory appear favorable. The match itself is the bottleneck; the career that follows is not.

Sources

1. Ching, K., Rozanitis, K., & Katabathina, V. (2025). Strategic application in the era of ERAS signals: Optimizing interview opportunities in radiology residency programs. Academic Radiology, 32(7), 4324–4331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.051
2. Futela, D., Malhotra, S., Payabvash, S., Lakhani, D. A., Gandhi, D., Vagal, A., Wintermark, M., & Malhotra, A. (2025). Recent trends in diagnostic radiology application and match rates. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.033
3. Lakhani, D. A., Radmard, M., Tafazolimoghadam, A., Patel, S., Murugesan, A., Malik, H., et al. (2025). Preference signaling in the radiology residency match: National survey of applicants. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 22(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.009
4. Malhotra, A., Kandala, K., Futela, D., Payabvash, S., Lakhani, D. A., Gandhi, D., Whitlow, C., & Duszak, R. (2026). The evolving United States radiologist pipeline: Trends in residency positions, resident workforce, and practicing radiologists per unit population. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.04.005
5. National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). (2024). Program Director Survey: Factors Considered in Selecting Applicants to Interview and Rank. NRMP.
6. National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). (2026). 2026 Main Residency Match: By the Numbers. NRMP.
7. Phillipi, M., Anavim, S., Sommer, D., Sasani, A., Floriolli, D., & Mihalic, A. P. (2025). Mixed signals: An analysis of the impact of preference signaling on diagnostic radiology residency applications and match outcomes. Academic Radiology, 32(10), 5671–5678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.07.022

IMGPrep is not associated with the NRMP®, the MATCH®, the ACGME, the AAMC, or the ECFMG®. Reproduction of NRMP figures requires written permission of the NRMP.