Neurology Residency in the United States: Preparation Pathways and Applicant Benchmarks for International Medical Graduates

Neurology Residency for International Medical Graduates Training in the United States

Neurology Training Structure in the United States

Adult neurology residency in the United States comprises four years of postgraduate training: one year of internal medicine or a transitional year (the preliminary year) followed by three years of neurology-specific training.^[1]

This structure reflects the specialty’s foundation in general medicine while providing intensive exposure to the diagnosis and management of disorders affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems. Child neurology follows a different pathway, requiring two years of pediatrics followed by three years of neurology training.^[1]

Key Benchmarks for IMG Neurology Applicants

Application Component	Competitive Target	References
USMLE Step 2 CK Score	≥240	[Document 2]
Neurology Clinical Rotations	2–3 rotations	[1–2]
Research Experiences	3–5 experiences	[Document 2]
Publications / Abstracts	5–10 outputs	[Document 2]
Letters from Neurologists	≥2 letters	[3–4]
Programs Ranked	≥10 programs	[Document 2]

The preliminary year establishes competency in general medical care, which remains essential for neurologists who frequently manage patients with complex comorbidities. Applicants to neurology must apply separately to preliminary internal medicine or transitional year programs through ERAS, as most neurology positions begin at the PGY-2 level. Some programs offer categorical positions that include the preliminary year, but these remain less common. The subsequent three years of neurology training encompass inpatient neurology services, outpatient clinics, neurocritical care, stroke services, epilepsy monitoring, neuromuscular medicine, and exposure to subspecialty areas.^[5-6]

Why Neurology Is Accessible to IMGs

Neurology has historically maintained higher IMG representation than most medical specialties, with approximately 31.3% of active neurologists in the United States being international medical graduates and one-third of current trainees having graduated from medical schools outside the United States or Canada.^[7] Among non-primary-care specialties, neurology consistently maintains one of the highest proportions of international medical graduates in both residency training and the practicing workforce. Several factors contribute to this accessibility:

• Cognitive specialty with fewer procedural barriers: Unlike surgical specialties, neurology emphasizes clinical reasoning, pattern recognition, and the neurologic examination rather than technical procedures. This allows programs to evaluate applicants based on intellectual capabilities and clinical knowledge rather than procedural experience that may be difficult for IMGs to obtain.
• Strong reliance on clinical reasoning: The diagnostic process in neurology—localizing lesions, synthesizing history and examination findings, and developing differential diagnoses—translates across training systems. IMGs with strong foundational knowledge can demonstrate competence through standardized examinations and clinical rotations.
• Geographic distribution of programs: Neurology residency programs exist across diverse geographic settings, including community hospitals and academic medical centers in regions with substantial workforce needs. Programs in underserved areas may be particularly receptive to IMG applicants.
• Persistent workforce demand: The national shortfall of neurologists is projected to worsen, with workforce adequacy estimated at approximately 88.6% in 2024 and projected to reach only 91.2% by 2037, with significant geographic disparities concentrated in non-metropolitan areas and southern states.^[8-9]

In the 2025 Match, neurology ranked among the top five specialties for non-U.S. citizen IMG matches, with 279 positions filled by this applicant group [Document 1]. Combined, IMGs (both U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen) filled 29.1% of PGY-1 neurology positions in 2025 [Document 1].

Article Navigation

This guide provides comprehensive preparation guidance for IMG applicants to neurology residency:

• Program Evaluation Criteria: How neurology programs assess applicants, with hierarchical ranking of selection factors
• Applicant Benchmarks: Data-driven metrics for competitive applications
• Strategic Preparation: Detailed guidance on clinical experience, research, and application timing
• Match Outcomes: Analysis of IMG participation and success rates
• Career Pathways: Overview of fellowship and practice opportunities

The preliminary year establishes competency in general medical care, which remains essential for neurologists who frequently manage patients with complex comorbidities. Applicants to neurology must apply separately to preliminary internal medicine or transitional year programs through ERAS, as most neurology positions begin at the PGY-2 level. Some programs offer categorical positions that include the preliminary year, but these remain less common. The subsequent three years of neurology training encompass inpatient neurology services, outpatient clinics, neurocritical care, stroke services, epilepsy monitoring, neuromuscular medicine, and exposure to subspecialty areas.^[5-6]

Why Neurology Is Accessible to IMGs

Neurology has historically maintained higher IMG representation than most medical specialties, with approximately 31.3% of active neurologists in the United States being international medical graduates and one-third of current trainees having graduated from medical schools outside the United States or Canada.^[7] Among non-primary-care specialties, neurology consistently maintains one of the highest proportions of international medical graduates in both residency training and the practicing workforce. Several factors contribute to this accessibility:

• Cognitive specialty with fewer procedural barriers: Unlike surgical specialties, neurology emphasizes clinical reasoning, pattern recognition, and the neurologic examination rather than technical procedures. This allows programs to evaluate applicants based on intellectual capabilities and clinical knowledge rather than procedural experience that may be difficult for IMGs to obtain.
• Strong reliance on clinical reasoning: The diagnostic process in neurology—localizing lesions, synthesizing history and examination findings, and developing differential diagnoses—translates across training systems. IMGs with strong foundational knowledge can demonstrate competence through standardized examinations and clinical rotations.
• Geographic distribution of programs: Neurology residency programs exist across diverse geographic settings, including community hospitals and academic medical centers in regions with substantial workforce needs. Programs in underserved areas may be particularly receptive to IMG applicants.
• Persistent workforce demand: The national shortfall of neurologists is projected to worsen, with workforce adequacy estimated at approximately 88.6% in 2024 and projected to reach only 91.2% by 2037, with significant geographic disparities concentrated in non-metropolitan areas and southern states.^[8-9]

In the 2025 Match, neurology ranked among the top five specialties for non-U.S. citizen IMG matches, with 279 positions filled by this applicant group [Document 1]. Combined, IMGs (both U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen) filled 29.1% of PGY-1 neurology positions in 2025 [Document 1].

---

How Neurology Residency Programs Evaluate Applicants

Neurology residency programs employ a multifactorial evaluation process that balances academic metrics with clinical experience, professional development, and interpersonal qualities. Compared with highly procedural specialties, neurology programs typically rely on holistic evaluation of applicants, with particular emphasis on clinical reasoning, letters of recommendation, and interview performance.

Hierarchy of Selection Factors

Program director surveys consistently demonstrate a clear hierarchy in applicant evaluation:

Selection Factor	Relative Importance	Key Considerations	References
Interview Performance	Very High	Clinical reasoning, communication, professionalism	[1-2]
Letters of Recommendation	Very High	Neurology faculty letters carry greatest weight	[3-4]
USMLE Step 2 CK Score	High	Primary standardized metric post-Step 1 pass/fail	[5-6]
Clinical Performance	High	U.S. clinical experience particularly valued for IMGs	[7-8]
Research Experience	Moderate	Demonstrates intellectual engagement; more important at academic programs	[9]
Personal Statement	Moderate	Articulates interest in neurology and career goals	[1]
Medical School Reputation	Lower	Less emphasis than clinical performance	[2]

These data emphasize that neurology programs prioritize direct clinical evaluation of applicants. Interviews and letters of recommendation consistently outweigh standardized examination scores in determining final ranking decisions. [9-15]

Interview Performance

The interview remains the most important factor in residency selection, with 99.5% of program directors rating it as important across specialties. [10] For neurology specifically, interviews assess:

• Clinical reasoning and localization skills: Neurology programs value applicants who can systematically approach neurologic problems, localize lesions based on clinical findings, and develop logical differential diagnoses. The intellectual framework of neurologic diagnosis—localization followed by etiologic reasoning—remains central to the specialty and often forms the basis of clinical discussions during residency interviews.
• Communication abilities: Neurologists frequently explain complex diagnoses to patients and families. Programs assess how applicants communicate medical information clearly and compassionately.
• Professional demeanor: Interactions with faculty, residents, and staff throughout the interview day contribute to overall assessment.
• Genuine interest in neurology: Programs seek applicants who can articulate specific aspects of neurology that appeal to them and demonstrate understanding of the specialty’s scope.

Survey data indicate that interactions with faculty and residents during interviews are among the most important factors influencing applicants’ rank lists, underscoring the bidirectional nature of the assessment. [16]

Letters of Recommendation

Letters of recommendation serve as a cornerstone of residency applications, providing third-party assessment of applicants’ clinical abilities, professional qualities, and potential for growth. [3-4] For neurology applications, letters from neurologists carry particular significance, as they can speak directly to applicants’ neurologic examination skills, clinical reasoning, and understanding of neurologic disease. [3]

High-quality letters typically include:

• The nature and duration of the relationship between writer and applicant
• Specific examples of clinical performance with neurologic patients
• Assessment of professional competencies
• Honest appraisal of areas for development

Program director letters tend to be of highest quality, incorporating in-training evaluation data and comprehensive assessment. [17] For IMGs, obtaining letters from U.S.-based neurologists who have directly supervised their clinical work strengthens applications substantially. [1][7]

USMLE Performance

The transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring in January 2022 has shifted emphasis toward Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) as the primary standardized examination metric. [11] A national survey of residency program directors found that 83.4% agreed or strongly agreed they would emphasize Step 2 CK scores following the Step 1 scoring change. [11] Step 2 CK scores demonstrate a moderate positive correlation with in-training examination performance across specialties (pooled correlation 0.52), providing programs with a validated measure of clinical knowledge. [12]

For IMGs who completed Step 1 before the pass/fail transition, numeric scores remain available and may still be considered. Data from the 2024 NRMP Charting Outcomes report indicate that matched non-U.S. IMGs in neurology had a mean Step 1 score of 234, compared with 230 for unmatched applicants [Document 2]. The mean Step 2 CK score for matched non-U.S. IMGs was 245, compared with 240 for unmatched applicants [Document 2].

Clinical Performance and U.S. Clinical Experience

Program directors across specialties consistently rank clinical performance among the most important selection criteria. [13] For international medical graduates, demonstrating clinical readiness within the U.S. healthcare system presents a particular challenge. U.S. clinical experience—obtained through clinical rotations or externships—provides evidence of familiarity with American medical practice, electronic health records, and team-based care models. [7][14]

Many institutions require ECFMG certification before allowing hands-on clinical participation, though some programs offer observerships to physicians awaiting certification. The distinction between observerships (observation only) and clinical rotations (direct patient care under supervision) is important: hands-on clinical rotations provide substantially stronger evidence of clinical competence and generate more meaningful letters of recommendation.

Research Experience

Research experience demonstrates intellectual curiosity, critical thinking skills, and capacity for self-directed learning. [15] A national survey found that 41% of program directors indicated meaningful research participation would be more important in offering interviews following the Step 1 scoring change, with this proportion higher among competitive specialties. [15]

In neurology, research opportunities span clinical investigation, translational neuroscience, and basic science. Common areas include stroke, epilepsy, movement disorders, neurodegenerative disease, neuroimmunology, and neuromuscular disorders. [18-19] Data from the 2024 Charting Outcomes report indicate that matched non-U.S. IMGs in neurology had a mean of 4.7 research experiences and 13.3 abstracts, presentations, and publications, compared with 3.4 research experiences and 8.8 scholarly outputs for unmatched applicants [Document 2].

---

Applicant Benchmarks in Neurology Residency

The following table summarizes benchmarks for matched IMG applicants in neurology:

Metric	U.S. IMG (Matched)	Non-U.S. IMG (Matched)	U.S. IMG (Unmatched)	Non-U.S. IMG (Unmatched)	References
Mean Step 1 Score*	217	234	218	230	[Document 2]
Mean Step 2 CK Score	237	245	229	240	[Document 2]
Research Experiences	4.2	4.7	2.6	3.4	[Document 2]
Publications/Abstracts	10.2	13.3	6.7	8.8	[Document 2]
Contiguous Ranks	7.0	7.5	2.6	2.5	[Document 2]
Percentage with Ph.D.	4.5%	4.1%	6.1%	3.5%	[Document 2]
Other Graduate Degree	25.0%	23.8%	33.3%	28.2%	[Document 2]

Step 1 scores available only for applicants who completed the examination before the pass/fail transition.

Interpretation of Benchmark Data

These data indicate that successful applicants typically demonstrate moderate research productivity and strong clinical knowledge performance. Several patterns emerge:

• Step 2 CK scores: Matched applicants have higher mean Step 2 CK scores than unmatched applicants (237-245 versus 229-240). For competitive positioning, applicants should target scores of 240 or higher.
• Research productivity: Matched applicants demonstrate substantially more research experiences and scholarly output. The difference between matched and unmatched applicants is more pronounced for research experiences (4.2-4.7 versus 2.6-3.4) than for examination scores, suggesting that research may serve as a differentiating factor among applicants with similar academic metrics.
• Number of programs ranked: The mean number of contiguous ranks differs dramatically between matched and unmatched applicants (7.0-7.5 versus 2.5-2.6). This finding highlights the strategic importance of broad application within the specialty.
• Graduate degrees: Interestingly, unmatched applicants have slightly higher rates of graduate degrees, suggesting that advanced degrees alone do not compensate for other application weaknesses.

Although examination performance correlates with match outcomes, the differences between matched and unmatched applicants are modest compared with highly competitive surgical specialties. This pattern suggests that neurology programs rely on a holistic evaluation of applicants rather than strict score thresholds.

Probability of Matching by Number of Programs Ranked

Data from the Charting Outcomes report demonstrate that IMGs ranking 10 or more neurology programs approach match probabilities of 80-90% [Document 2]. Match probability increases sharply as the number of programs ranked approaches ten, after which additional programs produce smaller incremental gains. Ranking fewer than 7-10 programs substantially reduces match probability for IMG applicants.

---

Strategic Preparation for International Medical Graduates

This section provides detailed guidance on building a competitive neurology application. For IMG applicants, preparation ideally begins 18-24 months before the intended Match cycle.

Suggested Preparation Timeline

Timeline	Key Activities	References
24 months before Match	Begin research involvement; identify potential mentors	[1-2]
18 months before Match	Obtain U.S. clinical rotations; establish neurology contacts	[3-4]
12 months before Match	Complete Step 2 CK; continue research productivity	[5]
9 months before Match	Secure letter writers; draft personal statement	[6]
6 months before Match	Finalize letters of recommendation; prepare ERAS	[7]
Application season (September)	Submit ERAS; prepare for interviews	[Document 1]

USMLE Step 2 CK Timing and Target Scores

Step 2 CK has become the primary standardized metric for residency selection following the Step 1 pass/fail transition. [11] Strategic considerations include:

• Timing: Complete Step 2 CK before application submission (ideally by August of the application year). Having a score available when applications are reviewed improves competitiveness, as programs can immediately assess academic readiness.
• Target score: For neurology competitiveness, aim for a Step 2 CK score of ≥240. Matched non-U.S. IMGs had a mean score of 245 [Document 2]. Scores below 230 may limit interview invitations at academic programs.
• Preparation: Allow adequate study time (typically 4-8 weeks of dedicated preparation). Consider commercial question banks and practice examinations to identify knowledge gaps.

Building U.S. Clinical Experience

U.S. clinical experience serves multiple purposes: it demonstrates familiarity with American healthcare delivery, provides opportunities for letters of recommendation, and allows applicants to assess their fit within the specialty. [7][14]

Recommended Clinical Rotations

• Inpatient neurology rotations (2-3 rotations recommended): Exposure to acute neurologic conditions including stroke, seizures, encephalopathy, and neuromuscular emergencies. At least one rotation should be at an academic medical center with neurology residency training.
• Stroke service exposure: Many neurology programs emphasize stroke training given the time-sensitive nature of acute stroke care and the expansion of endovascular interventions. Rotations on dedicated stroke services or at comprehensive stroke centers strengthen applications.
• Outpatient neurology clinics: Experience with chronic neurologic conditions demonstrates understanding of longitudinal patient relationships and ambulatory care models.
• Subspecialty exposure: Rotations in epilepsy monitoring units, movement disorders clinics, or neuromuscular medicine provide depth and help clarify subspecialty interests.

Observerships Versus Hands-On Rotations

The distinction between these experiences is critical:

• Observerships: Observation only, no direct patient care. May be available without ECFMG certification. Provide limited evidence of clinical competence and generate weaker letters of recommendation.
• Clinical rotations/externships: Direct patient care under supervision. Typically require ECFMG certification. Provide strong evidence of clinical readiness and generate meaningful letters of recommendation.

Prioritize hands-on clinical rotations whenever possible. If observerships are the only available option initially, use them to establish relationships that may lead to subsequent clinical opportunities.

Developing a Neurology Research Profile

Research experience strengthens applications by demonstrating intellectual engagement with the field. [15][20] For IMGs, research involvement may occur through several pathways:

• Research fellowships: Formal positions at U.S. academic medical centers, often lasting one to two years. These provide intensive research experience, mentorship, and opportunities for letters of recommendation.
• Remote collaborations: Participation in multicenter studies or data analysis projects that can be conducted internationally.
• Case reports and case series: Documentation of unusual presentations or treatment responses. These represent accessible entry points into scholarly activity.
• Retrospective studies: Analysis of existing clinical data to address research questions.
• Systematic reviews: Synthesis of existing literature on topics of clinical relevance.

Neurology-Specific Applicant Characteristics

Neurology programs often value specific qualities that reflect the nature of neurologic practice:

• Strong neurologic examination skills: The neurologic examination remains central to diagnosis. Applicants should demonstrate proficiency in systematic examination techniques and interpretation of findings.
• Localization reasoning: The ability to localize lesions based on clinical findings is fundamental to neurologic diagnosis. Programs assess this skill during interviews and clinical rotations.
• Patience with chronic disease management: Many neurologic conditions are chronic and progressive. Programs value applicants who demonstrate comfort with longitudinal care.
• Tolerance for diagnostic uncertainty: Neurologic diagnosis often requires iterative evaluation and acceptance of uncertainty. Programs value applicants who can manage ambiguity thoughtfully.

---

Key Components of the Neurology Residency Application

Personal Statement

The personal statement provides applicants the opportunity to articulate their interest in neurology, describe formative experiences, and outline career goals. Effective personal statements typically address:

• The intellectual or clinical experiences that sparked interest in neurology
• Specific aspects of neurologic practice that appeal to the applicant
• Research interests and how they connect to clinical neurology
• Long-term career aspirations, including subspecialty interests

For IMGs, the personal statement may also address the decision to pursue training in the United States and how prior training has prepared them for U.S. residency. [1][7]

Letters of Recommendation

Most neurology programs require three to four letters of recommendation. Optimal letter composition typically includes:

• At least two letters from neurologists who have directly supervised clinical work
• Letters that speak to specific clinical encounters and professional qualities
• Assessment of neurologic examination skills and clinical reasoning
• Honest appraisal of strengths and areas for growth [3]

For IMGs, obtaining letters from U.S.-based neurologists may require dedicated clinical rotations or research experiences. Letters from international faculty may supplement but typically should not replace U.S.-based letters. [1][7]

The Preliminary Year Application

Because most neurology positions begin at the PGY-2 level, applicants must separately apply to preliminary programs:

• Preliminary internal medicine: One year of internal medicine training. Most common pathway.
• Transitional year: Rotating internship with exposure to multiple specialties.
• Categorical neurology positions: Some programs offer positions that include the preliminary year.

Many applicants apply to 15-25 preliminary programs in addition to neurology programs to ensure successful placement in both components of training.

---

Neurology Match Outcomes and IMG Participation

The 2025 Main Residency Match offered 932 PGY-1 positions in adult neurology, with 925 positions filled (99.2% fill rate) [Document 1]:

Applicant Category	PGY-1 Positions Filled	Percentage of Total	References
U.S. MD Seniors	492	53.2%	[Document 1]
U.S. DO Seniors	154	16.6%	[Document 1]
U.S. IMGs	46	5.0%	[Document 1]
Non-U.S. IMGs	223	24.1%	[Document 1]
Other Categories	10	1.1%	[Document 1]

Contextualizing IMG Representation–IMG Neurology Residency

Neurology has substantially higher IMG representation than most procedural specialties:

Specialty	IMG Representation	Accessibility for IMGs	References
Internal Medicine	~40%	High	[Document 1]
Pathology	~36%	High	[Document 1]
Neurology	~29%	High	[Document 1]
Family Medicine	~27%	High	[Document 1]
Psychiatry	~14%	Moderate	[Document 1]
Emergency Medicine	~15%	Moderate	[Document 1]
Orthopedic Surgery	~3%	Low	[Document 1]
Plastic Surgery	~4%	Low	[Document 1]
Dermatology	~3%	Very Low	[Document 1]

This distribution illustrates that neurology occupies an intermediate position between primary care specialties and highly procedural fields in terms of IMG accessibility.

Trends in Neurology Positions

Between 2021 and 2025, neurology offered 195 more positions, representing a 19.7% increase [Document 1]. This expansion reflects efforts to address the neurologist workforce shortage and suggests continued opportunities for qualified applicants.

Match Rates and Strategic Implications

Overall match rates for IMGs remain lower than for U.S. medical graduates. In 2024, U.S. citizen IMGs had a residency match rate of 67.0% and non-U.S. citizen IMGs had a match rate of 58.5%, compared with 93.5% for U.S. MD seniors. [14] However, neurology-specific data suggest relatively favorable outcomes for IMG applicants who apply strategically.

Data demonstrate that IMGs ranking 10 or more contiguous neurology programs achieve match probabilities approaching 80-90% [Document 2]. Applying to fewer than 7-10 programs substantially reduces match probability.

---

Long-Term Career Pathways After Neurology Residency

Approximately 86-93% of graduating neurology residents pursue fellowship training. [5][21] Fellowship training typically lasts one to two years:

Subspecialty	Duration	Key Clinical Focus	References
Vascular Neurology	1-2 years	Stroke, neurovascular disease	[1]
Epilepsy	1-2 years	Seizure disorders, epilepsy surgery	[1]
Neurocritical Care	2 years	Neurointensive care	[2]
Clinical Neurophysiology	1 year	EEG, EMG, evoked potentials	[3]
Neuromuscular Medicine	1 year	Peripheral nerve, muscle disorders	[1]
Movement Disorders	1-2 years	Parkinson disease, dystonia	[1]
Headache Medicine	1 year	Migraine, headache disorders	[1]
Behavioral Neurology	2 years	Cognitive disorders, dementia	[1]

Career trajectories include academic practice, private practice, and hybrid models. For IMGs, visa status influences career planning: J-1 visa holders face a two-year home country residence requirement that may be waived through service in underserved areas. [12][14][22-24]

---

Conclusion: Strategic Pathway Summary

Neurology residency in the United States offers international medical graduates a pathway into a specialty with substantial workforce need, intellectual depth, and diverse career opportunities:

1. Neurology remains accessible to IMG applicants: With approximately 29% IMG representation, neurology offers substantially greater opportunities than surgical and procedural specialties.
2. Step 2 CK performance matters: Target scores of ≥240 for competitive positioning. Complete the examination before application submission.
3. U.S. clinical experience is critical: Prioritize hands-on clinical rotations over observerships. Aim for 2-3 neurology rotations including inpatient and stroke exposure.
4. Letters from neurologists carry substantial weight: Obtain at least two letters from U.S.-based neurologists who have directly supervised clinical work.
5. Research demonstrates intellectual engagement: Moderate research productivity (3-5 experiences, several publications/abstracts) strengthens applications.
6. Applying broadly improves match probability: Rank 10 or more programs to achieve match probabilities of 80-90%.
7. Interview performance is paramount: Prepare to demonstrate clinical reasoning, localization skills, and genuine interest in neurology.

The persistent neurologist workforce shortage, projected to continue through at least 2037, suggests ongoing opportunities for qualified international physicians to contribute to neurologic care in the United States.

Consult with IMGPrep

Neurology residency training in the United States requires careful academic preparation, strategic clinical exposure, and strong mentorship. For international medical graduates, understanding how programs evaluate applicants—including examinations, clinical experience, and academic achievements—is essential for building a competitive application.

IMGPrep provides individualized advising for international medical graduates pursuing U.S. neurology residency training.

Consult with IMGPrep to develop a structured strategy for your neurology residency pathway.

Schedule a Consultation

References

1. Jordan JT, Sellner J, Struhal W, Schneider L, Mayans D. International Issues: Obtaining an Adult Neurology Residency Position in the United States: An Overview. Neurology. 2014;82(14):e112-5.
2. Johnson NE, Maas MB, Coleman M, Jozefowicz R, Engstrom J. Education Research: Neurology Training Reassessed. The 2011 American Academy of Neurology Resident Survey Results. Neurology. 2012;79(17):1831-4.
3. Mahajan A, Cahill C, Scharf E, et al. Neurology Residency Training in 2017: A Survey of Preparation, Perspectives, and Plans. Neurology. 2019;92(2):76-83.
4. London ZN, Khan J, Cahill C, et al. 2017 Program Director Survey: Feedback From Your Adult Neurology Residency Leadership. Neurology. 2018;91(15):e1448-e1454.
5. Dall TM, Storm MV, Chakrabarti R, et al. Supply and Demand Analysis of the Current and Future US Neurology Workforce. Neurology. 2013;81(5):470-8.
6. Silvestre J, Ferdon RJ, Ravinsky RA, Reitman CA. Geographic Disparities in the Supply, Demand, and Adequacy of the United States Neurologist Workforce. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2026;146:111855.
7. Freeman WD, Vatz KA, Griggs RC, Pedley T. The Workforce Task Force Report: Clinical Implications for Neurology. Neurology. 2013;81(5):479-86.
8. Mahajan A, London Z, Southerland AM, Khan J, Schuyler EA. Immigrant Neurologists in the United States: The Path of Most Resistance. Neurology. 2021;96(8):378-385.
9. Wang A, Karunungan KL, Story JD, Ha EL, Braddock CH. Residency Program Director Perspectives on Changes to US Medical Licensing Examination. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2129557.
10. Shirkhodaie C, Avila S, Seidel H, et al. The Association Between USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Scores and Residency Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Academic Medicine. 2023;98(2):264-273.
11. Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX. Selection Criteria for Residency: Results of a National Program Directors Survey. Academic Medicine. 2009;84(3):362-7.
12. McElvaney OJ, McMahon GT. International Medical Graduates and the Physician Workforce. JAMA. 2024;332(6):490-496.
13. Gugger JJ, Reoma LB, Soni M, et al. Residency Training: A Practical Guide for Medical Students Who Are Planning a Future in Neurology. Neurology. 2020;94(15):673-677.
14. Sehgal RR, Sarva H, Safdieh JE, Robbins MS. Pearls and Pitfalls in Letters of Recommendation for Neurology Residency Applications. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2024;459:122951.
15. Gottlieb M, Boatright D, Landry A. Letters of Reference in the Current Era. Academic Medicine. 2024;99(9):942-945.
16. Chopra D, Joneja M, Sandhu G, et al. Reference Letters for Subspecialty Medicine Residency Positions: Are They Valuable for Decision-Making?. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(1):350.
17. Wolfson RK, Fairchild PC, Bahner I, et al. Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey. Academic Medicine. 2023;98(10):1185-1195.
18. Robbins MS, Haut SR, Lipton RB, et al. A Dedicated Scholarly Research Program in an Adult and Pediatric Neurology Residency Program. Neurology. 2017;88(14):1366-1370.
19. Fu KA, Saver JL, Perlman S. Emerging Subspecialties in Neurology: A Career as a Clinical Trialist in Neurology. Neurology. 2022;98(22):940-944.
20. Strausser SA, Dopke KM, Groff D, Boehmer S, Olympia RP. Importance of Residency Applicant Factors Based on Specialty and Demographics: A National Survey of Program Directors. BMC Medical Education. 2024;24(1):275.
21. Adair JC, Rudnicki SA, Boudreau E, et al. Survey of Training Programs’ Means for Promoting Neurology and Attracting Trainees. Neurology. 2006;67(6):936-9.
22. Daus K, McEchron M. The Impact of Medical Student Research as a Discussion Topic During the Residency Interview Process. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):556.
23. Sarva H, Patino GA, Rashid M, et al. The Status of Neurology Fellowships in the United States: Clinical Needs, Educational Barriers, and Future Outlooks. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):108.
24. Busl KM, Bleck TP, Varelas PN. Neurocritical Care Outcomes, Research, and Technology: A Review. JAMA Neurology. 2019;76(5):612-618.

Documents

1. National Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: 2025 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: NRMP; 2025.
2. National Resident Matching Program. Charting Outcomes in the Match: International Medical Graduates, 2024. Washington, DC: NRMP; 2024.

---